Bought a new kimber stainless custom ii 1911 45 acp and noticed that it had no dots on its sights. I was told those were target sights. I know and have heard of some people preferring those sights as it helps them focus on their target. How does this do it? Am anxious to try it, will probably run 500 rounds divided into several sessions over a course of a couple of weeks before I pass judgment. If not satisfied, will replace it with fiber optic sights. This gun is not meant for home defense but mainly going to be a range gun/fun gun for me. I have my glocks and fnp 45 tactical for home defense and have a mean ruger gp100 revolver too. Any info on how to take advantage of this sights is appreciated or pros and cons or experiences with blank target sights will be appreciated Im pretty sure not only by me but others.
You're going into a whole new world of customization. In general, yes, some people prefer the "no dot", or "plain" iron sights. I'm getting the sense is that you use your dots to get your sight alignment, which isn't really the right way to do it.
Glock.pro user jlweems had a great post about how to use sights properly-- but I can't find it. It might have been a Blog post that got wiped out when Glock.pro eliminated the entire Blog section with one keystroke. Can anyone find his post??
Here's a useful link-- from people who'll do a much better job of explaining the dots versus no dot sights:
sights « Search Results « PowerFactor Show
If you don't want to watch the whole Part One episode, go to about 26:00 and watch until the end.
Last edited by pistolcompetitor; 12-06-2011 at 10:25 PM. Reason: stewpid spell check
wow.... thank you for the link....![]()
No prob... thanks for your followup posts. Looking forward to seeing how the 1911 runs!
In honor of AW2 Jason Lawson (The Law). We'll never forget you.
Always evolve never stop learning. (Stolen from KeithD)
GLOCKS Owned - G17, G17OD, G17L, G19, G19c, G26, G34, G38, G23, G27
Thanks, Law. And I have to clarify my post -- I supplied the powerfactorshow link because those guys'll do a much better job than *I* would have. jlweems' post was downright awesome. I'm going to post an editorial about the Blog section separately.
If I have the text of that piece still, it is on another computer. The blog section here was wiped out prior to my getting a chance to save some pieces I wrote that were original to this site.
The problem with dots on sights is that they are for reference in low light in that they are supposed to help you see the sight bodies. They are not supposed to be used to line up the sights.
I'll try to dig it up or recreate ASAP.
Thanks guys! So basically no dots on the sights helps you focus and aim faster right? It seems to feel that way when I was testing out the sights.
I don't like standard three dot sights as the dots distract me. I do have a set or two of night sights with a wide rear notch with no white outline around the tritium, but lately I have been setting pistols up with a night sight in the front and a plain black rear sight.
I have a Iver Johnson 1911 that came with plain sights. Being accustomed to 3 dot sights I decided I preferred at least a white front sight. I got some white sight paint and painted the front post. I like it. This is only a range gun so I am not terribly worried about super fast target acquisition or low light shooting. I find it does make it easier to distinguish proper sight alignment having the front post contrast against the back notch. I don't have to look at the sights as much since the front sight stands out against the rear. I did the dame thing on my Ruger LCP, which doesn't really have sights. Its more of a pimple for the front and an almost non-existent rear notch. I painted the front post bright orange and the rear white. Looks like a Frankenstein, but it gives a good reference on the sights. Your mileage may vary.
Don't retreat! Reload!!!